Legal Opinion

Township of Laketon v. Akeley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This suit was brought, and judgment recovered, against defendant for taxes assessed against the Roscommon Lumber Company in the year 1887. It appears that the assessment was made on the supposition that the lumber company had lumber in the township subject to taxation on the day fixed by law for the assessment. The usual warrants were issued for the collection of the tax, but the township treasurer returned the tax as not collected, and a warrant was issued by the county treasurer with the same result. A suit was brought against the lumber company, but finally discontinued, upon a belief that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. JeppMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Putman v. Township of Fife LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Staley v. Township of ColumbusMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. McCallum v. Township of BethanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Menominee v. S. K. Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. City of Muskegon v. Amec, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Village of Chelsea v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Township of Homer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API