Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Jepp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) A-ssumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The only question in this ease is, whether under the charter of Detroit, as existing previous to July, 1881, suit could be brought by the city for unpaid personal property taxes.

The charter provided very fully for the enforcement of such collection by process from the Eeceiver of Taxes, who could at any time after default collect the amount by levy on any personal property of the delinquent within any part of the city. No provision was made to sell lands, except for the land taxes.

It has always been recognized as the law of this State, that where such a specific remedy is provided in the tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putman v. Township of Fife LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Staley v. Township of ColumbusMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Neib v. HindererMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Gilken Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Plymouth County v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Brule County v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API