Legal Opinion

Putman v. Township of Fife Lake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kent. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The township treasurer of Fife Lake brought this action to collect a tax assessed in 1876 on certain lumber owned by the firm of E. Putman & Company and manufactured in the township for them. The firm was composed of the plaintiffs in error and they all resided in Grand Rapids. The court below allowed the township to recover, and exceptions are urged.

*127First. It was objected that no evidence was admissible on the ground that the declaration was bad. In ruling against the objection the court committed no error.

The treasurer is allowed to sue in the name of the township and to “ take all lawful…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Detroit v. JeppMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. McCoy v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Greilick v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hood v. JudkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API