Legal Opinion
Jhirmack Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 1979No. Civ. 55939PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
Pursuant to section 400 of the Code of Civil Procedure, petitioner seeks review of an order of respondent court, denying its motion for change of venue. We grant the peremptory writ.
Petitioner is a California corporation, with its residence in Shasta County. The real party in interest, and two individuals who are stockholders in it, brought suit in Santa Barbara County against petitioner. The complaint alleges in its first cause of action, a breach by petitioner of a distributorship agreement; in its second cause of action the tort of interference with contractual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Shida v. Japan Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Shores v. Chip Steak Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lucas v. Lucas Ranching Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Tutor-Saliba-Perini Joint Venture v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kumar v. Embassy Kosher Tours, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Massae v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Gallin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.