Legal Opinion

Rigdon v. Rigdon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebbt, J.

The plaintiff brought this action at law to recover money from the defendant. Her complaint is based upon the decree of the divorce court in the state of Nevada and, so far as is material, alleges:

“I.
“That on the 26th day of September, 1939, by consideration of the District Court of the State of Nevada in and for the County of Washoe in the Second Judicial District, then and there and at all times thereafter being a court of general jurisdiction duly created, organized and existing under authority of the State of Nevada, judgment was duly and regularly entered and rendered against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Whittier v. WhittierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Foust v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kastner v. KastnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Emmons v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In re Marriage of BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API