State v. Kent

McIlvaine, Judge.

{¶ 1} This matter came before the court pursuant to defendant’s motion to dismiss. Following oral arguments, the court took the matter under advisement. Each party had previously filed legal briefs setting forth their positions.

{¶2} Let me start by stating that this court feels that the state of Ohio’s argument makes perfect sense. Because of strong public-safety issues and to combat the war on drugs, the state of Ohio has enacted certain laws that prohibit and limit the sale of pseudoephedrine products to the public. Legislators created R.C. Chapter 2925, which limits the…