Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1994No. 93-875PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that based upon a construction of the applicable sentencing statutes, he is entitled to be released from prison because *346he has already served his maximum possible sentence. The pertinent statutes follow.
Former R.C. 2929.71(A)(2) provided:
“ * * * The three-year term of actual incarceration imposed pursuant to this section shall be served consecutively with, and prior to, the life sentence or the indefinite term of imprisonment.” (140 Ohio Laws, Part I, 601.)
Former R.C. 2929.41 provided:
“(B) A sentence of imprisonment shall be served consecutively to any other sentence of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KrutzOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Jacobson v. Kaforey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.