Howard v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
James S. Howard was convicted of misconduct involving a controlled substance in the fourth degree,1 driving with a suspended, revoked, or expired registration,2 and driving without evidence of registration.3 Howard appealed to this court, arguing that the superior court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We reversed the decision of the superior court, concluding that Howard's admission that he had illegal drugs in the car was obtained in violation of his Mi-ramda rights.4
*1046We remanded the case to allow the parties to litigate what evidence, if any,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- State v. JoubertAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jarnig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
- Ambrose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- Pitka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
- Pitka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016