Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 18, 2009No. A-10171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

Peter F. Ambrose argues that he was subject to an unreasonable search when a trooper removed and opened a bindle of cocaine from Ambrose's shirt pocket following his arrest. We conclude that the trooper was authorized to remove the object from Am- brose's pocket because, based on its size and feel, the trooper reasonably believed that it could contain a razor blade. After removing the object from Ambrose's pocket, the trooper was authorized to open it because he immediately recognized that it was a bin-dle-that is, a single-purpose container used to carry illegal drugs.

Bac…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Schraff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API