Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pitka v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 17, 2016No. 2502 A-11122Published

1Concurrence

Judge MANNHEIMER,

with whom Judge ALLARD joins, concurring.

__ For the reasons I am about to explain, I believe that our supreme court should reexamine its decision in Crawford v. State- and the entire question of what containers are “1mmed1ate1y assomated with the person" of an arrestee.

In 1980, in Hinkel v. Anchorage,1 our supreme court announced the rule that a search incident to arrest could include the search of a closed container that was "immediately associated with the person" of the arrestee. But during the ensuing thirty-five years, both the supreme court and this Court have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Stephen Michael Berry, Robert Hugh Wilson, and Donald Gene RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Fresneda v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API