Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Insurance v. RRK, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2012No. 11-1099PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner, New Hampshire Insurance Company (“New Hampshire”), appeals the June 22, 2011, order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County granting partial summary judgment in favor of the respondent, RRK, Inc. (“RRK”), finding that under the commercial marine property insurance policy issued by New Hampshire, RRK’s barge and the barge’s contents are covered property under the policy and that a wear-and-tear exclusion in the policy is invalid. New Hampshire contends that the circuit court’s order wrongfully reforms the subject policy and that it is against public policy. RRK responds that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Andrick v. Town of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. Barbara SurbaughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. SER Universal Underwriters & Zurich American Insurance. v. Hon. Patrick WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Westfield Insurance v. Pinnacle Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Canal Insurance v. DupontDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
  5. ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Bowles Rice LLPDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API