Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pollock's Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided May 1, 1931No. 554Published

1Dissent

Stearne, J.,

dissenting. — I am unable to concur in the judgment of the majority of the court. The verbal and written agreement between the mother and son, entered into by the mother with full knowledge and conceded mental capacity — acquiesced in and acted upon by the parties for over six years and until the death of the mother — ought not now to be permitted to be overthrown by beneficiaries under the mother’s will and for their own benefit.

The ruling of the Auditing Judge, affirmed by the majority of the court, was that the son was a trustee of the corporate stock in question, and that,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Appeal of ReiffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API