Legal Opinion

Nirdlinger's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1927No. Appeals, 170, 171 and 172PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Samuel F. Nirdlinger died leaving a will devising his entire estate in trust. He authorized his trustees either tó retain his securities, or sell them and invest the proceeds, without being limited to those regarded as “legal investments.” The “rents, issues, income, dividends and revenue” were to be paid by the trustees to designated beneficiaries for life, and, at their death, the corpus was to pass to remaindermen. In September, 1920, the orphans’ court authorized the trustees to enter into an agreement with Erlanger and others by which leases of certain…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Earp's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. McLouth v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Catherwood TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Crawford EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Waterhouse's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Buist's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API