Legal Opinion

Lammers v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2019No. #28808-a-JMKPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKern, Justice

[¶1.] South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks (Department) entered Michael Lammers's farmland in Deuel County to build a new fence after a survey indicated that the physical boundaries between their properties did not coincide with the surveyed boundaries. Lammers filed an action against the Department seeking a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction. The Department moved for summary judgment, which the circuit court granted. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] Lammers owns and farms two tracts of land in Section 16 of Altamont Township, Deuel County. Tract 1 comprises *131the north half…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Steiner v. County of MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State Auto Insurance Companies v. B.N.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Doe v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Healy Ranch v. MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Yankton County v. McAllisterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Tammen and Jurgens v. TronvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. SD Citizens for Liberty, Inc. v. Rapid City Area School District 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API