Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baros v. Wells

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1989No. 89-37Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Justice

This is another case which upholds a summary judgment entered against an injured employee who sued a co-employee for culpable negligence. The majority approves the procedural disposition without jury trial and I do not. I dissent because the majority confuses the “most beneficial inference standard” with the burden of proof which this plaintiff must bear at trial. The majority sets up a standard of review for summary judgment and then, by result, does not follow the established standard.

The question of culpable negligence being decided by summary judgment has been a recent source of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Davenport v. EpperlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Greenwood v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API