Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1999No. 96-2003, 96-2004 CA A99486 (Control), CA A99487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Plaintiff, State of Oregon, seeks reversal and remand in a condemnation case in which the jury returned a verdict awarding defendants just compensation in the amount of $53,500. The trial comí subsequently awarded costs and attorney fees to defendants in the amount of $23,550.53. That amount was later reduced to $17,723.75 on defendants’ own motion. Plaintiffs only assignment of error concerns the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion in lim-ine excluding evidence of contaminants found on the condemned land after plaintiff had filed the condemnation action. We reverse and remand for a new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pape v. Linn CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Highway Commission v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Vokoun v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Administración De Terrenos De Puerto Rico v. Ponce Bayland Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2021
  5. Tri-County Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. v. Walnut Hill, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API