Simmons v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIP M. HESS, Judge.
Introduction
Richard Simmons (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that he would have to serve eighty-five percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole. We affirm.
Factual Background
In 2007, Movant was charged with first-degree assault and armed criminal action. In 2009, in a separate case, Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Voegtlin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Arak L. McCoy v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Aminadab Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.