Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2014No. ED 99614PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIP M. HESS, Judge.

Introduction

Richard Simmons (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that he would have to serve eighty-five percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole. We affirm.

Factual Background

In 2007, Movant was charged with first-degree assault and armed criminal action. In 2009, in a separate case, Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Voegtlin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Arak L. McCoy v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Aminadab Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API