Legal Opinion
Waite v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2002No. S-01-193PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
INTRODUCTION
The issue presented in this case is whether an order denying a temporary injunction and dissolving a temporary restraining order is a final, appealable order. Because it is not, we are without jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal.
BACKGROUND
On January 12, 2001, the plaintiffs, Roland F. Waite and Frank Krejci, filed a petition in the district court seeking a temporary restraining order, a temporary injunction, and a permanent injunction against the City of Omaha and other city officials to prevent certain ordinances, passed on January 9, from going into effect. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. StrussNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Keef v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. SahlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Barkley v. PoolNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCullough v. McCulloughNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Cerny v. LongleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Huskey v. HuskeyNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Nichols v. NicholsNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.