Legal Opinion
Coopersmith v. Lehman Broth., Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 27, 2004No. CIV.A.03-10907 NMGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
This pending class action was filed by Robert Coopersmith (“Coopersmith”) and Allen Eckert (“Eckert”) individually and on behalf all similarly situated purchasers of the common stock of Razorfísh, Inc. (“Razorfish”) alleging violations of federal securities law by Defendant Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Lehman”). On May 18, 2004, Magistrate Judge Judith Dein allowed Coopersmith’s motion for appointment as lead plaintiff. This Court now considers Lehman’s objections to that decision.
I. Background
The following facts are taken from the Memorandum of Decision…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Paul J. Grella, Trustee v. Salem Five Cent Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- National Foreign Trade Council v. NatsiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Telxon Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swack v. Credit Suisse First BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In re Nyse Specialists Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In re Sonus Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Endress v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Jimenez v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.