Legal Opinion

Robison v. Bate

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1962No. 4521PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, J.:

Appellant, as plaintiff below, seeks determination of his and the defendants’ (respondents’) relative rights to use certain waters of Piermont Creek and of certain springs.

In his first cause of action plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of the O’Neil ranch and Keegan meadow and that defendant Bate is the owner of the Bate ranch which separates the O’Neil ranch and the Keegan meadow. Eldridge, as lessee of the Bate property, is joined as a defendant. Plaintiff further alleges that Piermont Creek flows from the northeast to the southeast in a natural channel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Walsh v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Maher v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Samuel Kweskin v. Jay L. FinkelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Timney v. TimneyNevada Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gladstone v. GregoryNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Noble v. NobleNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lagrange Construction, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bowers v. EdwardsNevada Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API