Legal Opinion

Pease v. Taylor

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1970No. 5909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J. :

Appellant Arthur E. Pease was one of three comakers of a 90-day, $16,500 promissory note dated September 15, 1966. Respondent Wesley S. Taylor was the named beneficiary of the note. The note was not paid. Taylor sued Pease for the $16,500 plus interest and attorney fees. Pease’s only defense was that the transaction was usurious. 1 Pease contends (1) that an amount less than the $16,500 was advance by Taylor and (2) that from that amount Taylor further withheld “brokers’ fees” that constituted prepaid interest in excess of the legal rate. 2 We cannot reach…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irene A. Janzen, Administratrix of the Estate of Waldo R. Janzen, Deceased v. Wilber W. Goos and Ivan GottulaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lagrange Construction, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Chisholm v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. OlsenNevada Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ryan's Express Transportation Services, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Trident Construction Corp. v. West Electric, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allen v. WebbNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Noble v. NobleNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API