Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1914No. 3421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error From Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Ernes Oldfield, Judge. ■ Action by C. O. Rogers against the City of Oklahoma City. Judgment for less than the sum demanded, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

On May 11, 1909, C. G. Rogers, plaintiff in error, entered into a contract with John Iiubatka, city marshal for the city of Oklahoma City, whereby Rogers agreed “to feed all of the city prisoners in the city jail of Oklahoma City at the stipulated price of ten cents per meal during the term of office of John Iiubatka.” The plaintiff furnished meals for the prisoners as per the contract during the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 1909, and continued so to do until the 23rd day of December, 1909, and was paid by the city for the meals furnished and received to that date, at which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Crowder v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Swanson v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ash v. Chas F. Noble Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Wichita Finance & Thrift Company v. City of LawtonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Municipal Gas Co. of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Ward v. City of Big SpringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API