Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Monschein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 24, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 N.J. Super. 55 (1952)

93 A.2d 576

ARMOND J. CARUSO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH MONSCHEIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SADIE A. MONSCHEIN AND MAX KRIEGER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 3, 1952.

Decided December 24, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and CONLON.

Mr. Samuel Milberg argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. George Clott, attorney).

Mr. Jack Prizzia argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

The plaintiff sued to recover for damage done to merchandise in his store, caused by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LaBrasca v. HinchmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Vollkommer v. MengeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Dowler v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API