Legal Opinion

Vollkommer v. Menge

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The gist of this action is the negligent performance of a landlord’s gratuitous undertaking to repair the demised premises. There was a judgment for plaintiff; and defendant appeals. A prior judgment of nonsuit was reversed, and a venire de novo awarded, upon the ground that, due to an erroneous conception of the apposite legal principles, material evidence offered by plaintiff was barred. 116 N. J. L. 82.

The single point raised by the reasons for reversal is whether there is any basis in the proofs for the finding of negligence chargeable to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Shute v. BillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryan v. GilpinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  2. Grugan v. Shore Hotels Finance & Exchange Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  3. Caruso v. MonscheinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API