Legal Opinion

Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1959No. Appeals, Nos. 275, 276, and 277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Our Public Utility Commission, in the order before us, issued a permit to Pamco Inc., authorizing it: “To transport, as a contract carrier, fats, entrails, bones, animal protein, meat and bone scrap, tankage, bone meal, residue of packing-house offal (semi-processed), dried blood, greases, tallows and processed articles and materials made from the above-described commodities; *55and equipment, products and materials used in processing and packaging the above commodities for Inland Products, Inc., from its plant in the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, to points in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Merchants Parcel Delivery, Inc. v. Pa. Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Wiley v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Brink's, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. D'Agata National Trucking Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API