Legal Opinion

Sharon v. Rico

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1992No. A054262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, Acting P. J.—

I

Introduction

In this case we hold when, prior to marriage, spouses each contributed separate property funds to purchase real property, with title taken in both names as tenants in common, and payments after marriage are made with community funds, the correct method to calculate the separate and community interests of the parties upon dissolution is the same method as when the property is the separate property of only one spouse and payments after marriage are made with community property funds, that method generally known as the Moore-Marsden rule.

*709II

Background

Sharon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. In Re Marriage of NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of RicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API