Legal Opinion

Alden v. Mayfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1917No. Civ. No. 1654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. J. Buckles and W. T. 0 ’Donnell, Judges. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This appeal grows out of a second trial of this action. In the former trial, as in the second, the defendant prevailed, and an appeal was taken by the plaintiff to the supreme court from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial. The judgment and the order were reversed (Alden v. Mayfield, 163 Cal. 793, [Ann. Cas. 1914A, 258, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1022, 127 Pac. 44]), and the nature of the action and the issues as presented and tried at the former trial are stated in the opinion in that case as follows:

“Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injury to her freehold, and for an injunction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Roberts v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API