Legal Opinion

Hiott v. Bishop

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 4, 1964No. 18248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

In this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, the jury awarded plaintiff-respondent a verdict for actual damages in the amount of $5,000.00. The defendant-appellant, at appropriate times, made a motion for nonsuit, a motion for a directed verdict, and after the return of the verdict, a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto or for a new trial, in the alternative, all of which were denied.

The single question on appeal, as stated by defendant-appellant’s counsel in the brief, is as follows:

“Did His Honor err in refusing the Appellant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Harrison v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Nettles v. Your Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Wynn v. ROODSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Augustine v. ChristopouloSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Beverly v. SarvisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. Greenwood v. Anderson Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
  4. Singleton v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API