Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Herring

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 16, 1965No. 18399PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

The plaintiff, Daniel P. Hicks, sustained serious and painful injuries while riding as a guest passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant, Marvin Doll Herring, and brought this action for damages. The jury found for plaintiff $2,000.00 actual damages and $7,500.00 punitive damages and defendant has appealed. Plaintiff has adopted defendant’s statement of the questions involved as follows:

“1. Was respondent guilty of contributory recklessness and heedlessness so as to bar recovery under the guest statute ?
“2. Was the verdict improper?”

The nature of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Fennell v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Aaron v. Hampton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Watts v. South Bound R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gamble v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Vivian Mattison Morty Ronald Mattison v. Dallas Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API