Legal Opinion

Beverly v. Sarvis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1965No. 18403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

In this action the respondent, Beverly, sought to recover from the respondent, Sarvis, and the appellant, Barringer, damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Beverly at the time of the collision was riding in an automobile owned by his mother, and being operated by Sarvis, which said automobile collided with one operated by Barringer. Sarvis filed a cross-complaint against his co-defendant Barringer, and, on the trial of the case, the jury returned verdicts favorable to both Beverly and Sarvis against the appellant Barringer.

The appeal is from an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Abeles v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Hiott v. BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Still v. BlakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Vaughan v. Southern Bakeries CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1965
  3. Brave v. BlakelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Poole v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. SeaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API