Salzbrun v. Salzbrun
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Brown county for a limited divorce. Tbe case was tried before Webber, J., who made findings of fact, and as conclusion of law found, among other things, that plaintiff was entitled to judgment, dissolving the bonds of matrimony. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Plaintiff sued for a limited divorce from her husband, under G-. S. 1894., §§ 4814-4820, inclusive. The allegation of residence of the parties in the complaint is
“That the plaintiff and defendant are each of them inhabitants of this state, and are each of them residents of, and residing in, the county of Brown, in this state.”
*288In addition to this averment, sufficient facts are undoubtedly set forth to constitute a cause of action for either an absolute or limited divorce for cruel and inhuman treatment. The defendant, answering, admits the allegations of residence stated in the complaint, but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ArmingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Thelen v. ThelenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coleman v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Wyman v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Heinze v. HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Hoyt v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1898