Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Kountze

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1898No. 7886Published

Error from tbe district court of Gage county. Tried below before Busi-i, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, O.

The defendants in error, four in number, sued on a .promissory note alleged to have been made by the plaintiff in error to the Nebraska National Bank of Beatrice, and by it to have been indorsed and transferred to the plaintiffs as collateral security to another note of like amount, made by other persons to the Beatrice bank and by’it sold to plaintiffs. The petition averred that the plaintiffs were partners doing business in New York under the name of Kountze Bros. The answer specially denied the partnership alleged, admitted the making of the note sued on, but denied generally all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salzbrun v. SalzbrunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Davis v. Nebraska National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API