State v. Ikirt
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
We granted the state’s petition for review to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the defendant’s convictions because the state produced testimony of a witness’ failure to take a polygraph examination.
The facts necessary for the resolution of this case follow. Jeffrey Ikirt, former son-in-law of Peter Lozano, was charged with arson, burglary, and criminal damage in connection with the burning of the Lozano residence.
At trial, three experts testified for the state that the fire was the result of arson rather than accident. The state’s case rested entirely…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RutledgeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.