Legal Opinion

State v. Ikirt

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. CR-86-0201-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

We granted the state’s petition for review to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the defendant’s convictions because the state produced testimony of a witness’ failure to take a polygraph examination.

The facts necessary for the resolution of this case follow. Jeffrey Ikirt, former son-in-law of Peter Lozano, was charged with arson, burglary, and criminal damage in connection with the burning of the Lozano residence.

At trial, three experts testified for the state that the fire was the result of arson rather than accident. The state’s case rested entirely…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. RutledgeArizona Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API