Legal Opinion

Rome Mfg. Co. v. Bailey

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 17, 1931No. 1218PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

The Borne Manufacturing Company, feeling aggrieved at the action of the referee, has filed a petition for review of an order made by him in which he denied the petitioner’s claim for three large road-building machines in possession of the bankrupt at the time of adjudication, and subsequently taken charge of by the trustee, who is now claiming them for the benefit of the general creditors under what is known as our sign statute, section 3352 of the Mississippi Code of 1930. The reclamation petition asked for the return of the property or the payment in lieu thereof of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Paine v. Hall Safe & Lock Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gumbel v. KoonMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Waynesboro Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1932
  2. United States v. One Hundred Thirty-nine Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1952
  3. Allen v. National Manufacture & Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Allen v. National Manufacture & Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. In re MathenyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API