Legal Opinion

In re Matheny

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 30, 1932No. 2998Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

The petitioners, Spear & Suskind, of Providence, R. I., are engaged in the business of manufacturing jewelry and other merchandise and selling it at wholesale. They seek to review an order of the referee denying their claim for reclamation of a¡ number of articles delivered on December 12,1931, to R. G. Matheny, trading as R. G. Matheny & Co., a retail merchant doing business in Jackson, Miss.

The invoice for the goods, prepared by petitioner, recites that they were “sold to R. G. Matheny & Co., 157 E. Capitol St., Jackson, Mississippi.” The terms of sale are set forth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Samson Tire & Rubber Co. v. EgglestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  2. Atlantic Horse Insurance v. NeroMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  3. P. E. Payne Hardware Co. v. International Harvester Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gillaspy v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  5. In re CaverDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API