Legal Opinion

Lutz Et Ux. v. Allegheny County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1930No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellants had an estate in entireties in and were in possession of a tract of land in Allegheny County, having thereon a house — plaintiff’s home — , a barn, and other improvements. The County of Allegheny was authorized by appropriate legislation to construct an aviation landing field, and, by resolution of the county commissioners, adopted January 8, 1929, it appropriated appellant’s property. Pursuant thereto, the commissioners, having failed to agree with the owners on the amount to be paid for the land, asked the court below to appoint viewers. Objections…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Pittsburgh v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  2. Darlington v. United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  3. Solar Electric Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney-General v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmidt Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Ramad Realty Corp. v. Springettsbury Township Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In re Condemnation by the Manheim Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County2005
  4. In re Private Road in Juniata TownshipPerry County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1948
  5. Southern Delaware County Authority v. Boothwyn Farms Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API