Legal Opinion

Solar Electric Company's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1927No. 1; Appeal, 88PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Whether a borough has power to condemn and appropriate the property and franchises of an electric light company located therein and furnishing electric light and power to the municipality and its citizens and to others outside the borough limits is the question we are to answer on this appeal. From the commencement and throughout the proceedings appellant has denied the power of the municipality to take its property.

The argument made to us covered a wide field. We think the proper contentions of the parties lie within a small compass, that of the language of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Commonwealth v. Erie & North-East RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. Manorville Borough v. Flenner.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Williamsport v. Citizens' Water & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Canal CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Valmont Developing Co. v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Bangor Electric Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Elliott Consolidated School District v. BusboomDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
  5. Schmidt Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API