Legal Opinion
Brune v. Marshall
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1976No. 1-276A26PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.
Plaintiff-appellee Marshall brought this action to recover a $20 fee paid to defendant-appellant Bruñe as partial payment for admission to the “Alcohol Deferred Prosecution Program”, a pre-charging alcohol related rehabilitation procedure established and administered by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor Bruñe.
Bruñe counterclaimed, requesting a definitive judicial opinion of the legality and constitutionality of the “Alcohol Deferred Prosecution Program”.
The trial court held the program to be unconstitutional and awarded a judgment of $20 to plaintiff Marshall. From this judgment Bruñe appeals.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Spencer v. Criminal Court, Marion Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Evansville v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Neeriemer v. Daviess Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. MarketIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Brown v. State Ex Rel. BruneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Deurloo v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sharpe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mounts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.