Hubbard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Harold Hubbard appeals following his conviction of two counts of theft by taking, asserting the general grounds and contending that the two counts of theft by taking should have been merged because they arose out of the same transaction.
1. The general grounds are without merit. The evidence showed that Billy Howell Ford was illegally entered and certain items were removed. Appellant was arrested while driving an automobile owned by Kirby Cox which had been stolen from the service department of the Ford dealership, and other items stolen from the dealership, including a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Breland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McConnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Lucas v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.