Legal Opinion
Collier v. Insignia Financial Group
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 25, 1999No. 90,482PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1991 §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified the following question:
May a plaintiff pursue a public policy tort claim under Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 1989 OK 22, 770 P.2d 24 (1989), for quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliatory constructive discharge in light of the remedies available under federal and state anti-discrimination laws?
I
RELEVANT FACTS
¶ 2 While employed by Insignia Financial Corporation [Insignia], Collier was allegedly subjected to unwelcome sexual…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. NeztsosieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wilson v. MuckalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Strozinsky v. School District of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Barker v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Clinton v. State Ex Rel. Logan County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.