Clinton v. State Ex Rel. Logan County Election Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDREATU, Justice:
{1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 0.S8.1991, §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Vicki Miles-LaGrange, certified the following question:
In light of Collier v. Insignia Financial Group, 1999 OK 49, 981 P.2d 321, is a gender status-based discrimination claim, such as one's status as a pregnant female, actionable under a Burk public policy tort theory?
I
COURTS FUNCTION WHEN RESPONDING TO A CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM A FEDERAL COURT
T2 Since the case is not before us for decision we refrain from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Green v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Vasek v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Barker v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.