Legal Opinion

Clinton v. State Ex Rel. Logan County Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 2001No. 95,926PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDREATU, Justice:

{1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 0.S8.1991, §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Vicki Miles-LaGrange, certified the following question:

In light of Collier v. Insignia Financial Group, 1999 OK 49, 981 P.2d 321, is a gender status-based discrimination claim, such as one's status as a pregnant female, actionable under a Burk public policy tort theory?

I

COURTS FUNCTION WHEN RESPONDING TO A CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM A FEDERAL COURT

T2 Since the case is not before us for decision we refrain from…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Green v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Vasek v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Barker v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API