Legal Opinion

Tiller v. Cincinnati Discount Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 1, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Reversing.

The appellee, the Cincinnati Discount Company, brought suit in equity against the appellant, Armand A. Tiller, alleging in substance and effect that the defendant had been its agent to collect installment payments due on conditional sales contracts assigned to it by F. M. Tiller; that since the death of F. M. Tiller, the defendant had been engaged in the same business of selling musical; instruments and had himself transferred similar contracts to the plaintiff, with the agreement that he would collect the amounts due thereon and make…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Home Bond Co. v. McChesneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. General Film Co. v. SamplinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. Childs v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Smith v. York Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Company v. VasseurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Goetz v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  4. Román v. District Court of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  5. Román v. Tribunal de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API