State v. Bendzula
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge. *
Appellant State of Minnesota disputes the trial court’s downward durational departure from state sentencing guidelines, contending that the court acted beyond its authority under the sentencing guidelines. Giving deference required for the trial court’s exercise of discretion in assessing the particular circumstances, of this case, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1999, Hennepin County authorities arrested an immigrant friend of respondent Randy Bendzula for selling cocaine. The seller was told that he could avoid deportation by cooperating with the police and implicating those who…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. StempfleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017