Hanson v. Tempe Life Care Village, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 Pamela Hanson, as personal representative of the estate of Amy Hanson (“Estate”), appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Tempe Life Care Village (“Village”). We conclude that the terms of the agreement between Amy Hanson and the Village allowed her to receive a full refund of the entrance fee by giving written notice and vacating her unit within twelve months of taking occupancy. Therefore, we reverse and remand to the trial court to enter judgment for the Estate.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 This case arises out of a life care contract between the Village and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Kintner v. WolfeArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Pasco Industries, Inc. v. Talco Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Salib v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Malad, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Aequor Healthcare Services LLC v. Meda Health LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026