Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 2006No. 26197PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

The post-conviction relief (“PCR”) court granted Bobby Watson (“Watson”) a new trial, finding that counsel was ineffective for eliciting and failing to object to improper hearsay testimony. This Court granted the State’s petition to review the PCR judge’s decision. We reverse.

Factual / Procedural Background

In 1999, a nine year old child accused Watson of sexual abuse. The victim made the allegation to her grandmother, who subsequently took the victim to a pediatrician. The pediatrician was unable to discover any evidence of abuse. However, a pediatric nurse practitioner,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Council v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API