Legal Opinion

Luten v. Sharp

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 21, 1912No. 1,356PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by Daniel B. Luten against Walter Sharp and others. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

The bill in this case presents some nine separate letters patent owned by complainant, covering the process of constructing reinforced concrete work, and prays injunction *152against defendants restraining them from infringing the claims of said patents, for an accounting, etc. Defendants have demurred to the bill.

The precise point relied on by defendants at the argument in support of their demurrer, now that copies of said letters patent have been filed with the bill, is that the acts done by defendants, averred to constitute infringement of complainant’s rights secured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. American Bell Tel. Co. v. Southern Tel. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1888
  3. Pitts v. WhitmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
  4. McMillin v. St. Louis & Miss. Valley Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1883
  5. Haven v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1873

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bonney Supply Co. v. HeltzelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API