Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Consuegra

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1994No. Docket Nos. G012799, G013084PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

— Juan Consuegra, Esther Consuegra, Victor Hugo Mejia and Ramon Eugenio Calderon appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess cocaine for sale and possession of cocaine for sale, with quantity enhancements, contending: (1) the trial court erred by instructing the jury that possession for sale requires only knowledge that the drugs would be sold eventually by someone else; and (2) there was insufficient evidence of substantial involvement to support the quantity enhancements. Juan Consuegra also contends there was insufficient evidence as to the substantive charges and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. United States v. Jose Rafael PenagosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. LuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. The People v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. ParraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API