Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Teague

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 28, 1977No. 5762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant City from $109,939. judgment in favor of plaintiffs Teague, et al.

Plaintiffs sued defendant seeking mandamus requiring defendant to issue plaintiffs a waterway development permit to reroute two small streams over an 8V2 acre tract owned by plaintiffs, and for damages resulting from denial of such permit by the Austin City Council.

Trial was to a jury which found:

Issue 1. Defendant thru its course of conduct between January 1973 and June 26, 1975, refused to allow plaintiffs to alter the portions of Harpers Branch and the Ramble…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. Ventures in Property I v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. City of Austin v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Lomax v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API