Legal Opinion

United States v. Yates

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 14, 1994No. NMCM 93 00076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Senior Judge:

The Government concedes that certain information provided to the convening authority by her staff judge advocate (SJA) in a memorandum, dated 11 December 1992, 5 days before the submission of the formal post-trial recommendation, and addressing the merits of the appellant’s request for clemency, contained adverse matter within the meaning of Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1107(b)(3)(B). That Rule states in pertinent part:

Before taking action the convening authority may consider ... (iii) Such other matters as the convening authority deems appropriate. However, if the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. LowryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. SidersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. JordonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API