United States v. Yates
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Senior Judge:
The Government concedes that certain information provided to the convening authority by her staff judge advocate (SJA) in a memorandum, dated 11 December 1992, 5 days before the submission of the formal post-trial recommendation, and addressing the merits of the appellant’s request for clemency, contained adverse matter within the meaning of Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1107(b)(3)(B). That Rule states in pertinent part:
Before taking action the convening authority may consider ... (iii) Such other matters as the convening authority deems appropriate. However, if the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. LowryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. SidersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. JordonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996