Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 2, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Bourbon Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

The appellee, Harry L. Mitchell, instituted this action in the Bourbon Circuit Court to recover damages for a personal injury which he alleges was occasioned him through the negligence of the appellant, Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company, and upon a trial of the case in the circuit court, a verdict for $20,000.00 was returned by the jury, and a judgment was entered thereon in favor of appellee, Mitchell.

Prom this judgment appellant company prosecutes this appeal, alleging that the trial court committed error to its prejudice: (1) in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. ReaumeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Heinig's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. City of Pineville v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Heil v. SeidelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Duval v. DuvalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. S. L. Crook Corp. v. Blackburn, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API